483
States except as special officers: whilst therefore it was natural and just that former officers in the native States should, on the Federation, rank with Cadets in the Federated Malay States, it did not follow that they ranked as Cadets in the Straits Settlements. There may have been cases of interchange for executive reasons between former officers in the native states and Cadets in the Straits Settlements, but that did not assure to such officers the status of Cadets in the Straits Settlements. But the statement in his 3rd paragraph can be referred to the Straits Settlements for confirmation or contradiction.
Allowing that Mr. Irving held in the Federated Malay States Service the status of a Cadet, his transfer to this Colony, where there is no class of officers, not being Cadets, who have the status of Cadets, did not carry with it a continuance of his status of a Cadet so as to create in this Colony a new rank of public officer. It may be argued perhaps that, as the Federated Malay States Service and the Hongkong Service are Services whose officers are interchangeable, Mr. Irving, as an officer having the status of a Cadet, carried that status with him on transfer here; but the answer is I think that only Cadet Officers and not officers having the status of a Cadet, are interchangeable: if it were otherwise, we, having no officers with the status of Cadet who are not Cadets, would have no one to send to the Federated Malay States and should therefore be the losers. Further it is to be borne in mind that the interchangeability of Cadet Officers was first promulgated in 1896, a date posterior to the date when Mr. Irving joined the Service of the State of Perak as a Junior Officer in 1891.
Coming new to the 4th paragraph of Mr. Irving's letter on the point of promotion, He seems to base his eligibility for promotion on a telegram from
the
483
.
*
.Y TO
(Core{lenxt wor
Jonnao bas ton neob golvvi
tarit mi tot ɛbnejлoo ed dariv : Jebab s ni ed Jarð hradnoo
of beltline si dove na baɛ Jebat & to arusin and mad mri
Imijmeneteng a ovali etabso violaw of #taog od mottomong
soitto ns ablog er det dog? nứt
Juergte en ut utefo Istinexeteng & aai Jebat & Kotsin ot
ènerumis na ev di " :Jebel a to arte e out man en JBCF
(BanoT-a.I.W.L‚rije?,basless? .ateael dard wollot birow Ji
blor ils oựw alwed bra docobooW
‚#avonebo” (anovi
-wada Jne boup cantada omne stít evad blow ,8moltio jubæð
animal .*% dotdw no brore
t
•
t
חז".
.*
ald Janð viðnanaqqa et andata jebað oð alsto até asand
to eta÷2 ext ni teol790 reinut ☎ as 1981 al İnendnloqqa
ari* nerw pahiu od sol to na of tabninjoqga na nav XA109
Jebat s 20% I at bøtatsboˆ œs99€ 20/638 ysisk avolev
molts 5. sið noqir tøft bna bedrtoqga naud Va bisrow
arolnav eft at med? areol770 exit 2081 +) @oslų grids!
‚ademiirioqgps ried 1 bedrotalb to @int asiatP aeviisa
ritiw gnitoet Iaupe ro imali blodel Buizeq enew Jud
(arool110 remot bos ajabst noowjed as notComong,adoba?
,yðimoinea yɗ bonturel ob anled
ml xat. J I Tone at al pilve) .14
+
ed' dard 193)øl aid to digangereg bnt out ni galista
Siloqqa xiland ›k v ansol110 bus onnol120 robot to mot fooq
riłłw raq & no mɑdt mal zuq vɗ benue :3 Bas done sa bo-
Tol tadaneltisë alien? MUDA stuba) banaaŋ bræ æðabæð
aðness Id2a8 aðlán‡2 and bun asiestā galax b Jatobat
-arobot on!" od rotną bin ¡neobvioë ateraqan -ma apolvoR
odt mi argalt 0 Joba 80.8/? (Almę b darshy¶ allt to molt-
*
evi en si' of bunio a ton stew aðnevold (GP a'ianj? 893842
States except as special officers: whilst therefore it was natural and just that former officers in the native States should, on the Federation, rank with Cadets in the Federated Malay States, it did not follow that they ranked as Cadets in the Straits Settlements. There may have been cases of interchange for executive reasons between former officers in the native states and Cadets in the Straits Settlements, but that did not assure to such officers the status of Cadets in the Straits Settlements. But the statement in his 3rd. paragraph can be referred to the Straits Settlements for confirmation or contradiction.
Allowing that Mr. Irving held in
5.
the Federated Malay States Service the status of a Cadet, his transfer to this Colony, where there is no class of officers, not being Cadets, who have the status of Cadets, did not carry with it a continuance of his status of a Cadet so as to create in this Celony a new rank of public officer. It may be argued perhaps that, as the Federated Malay States Service and the Hongkong Service are Services whose officers are interchangeable, Mr. Irving, as an officer having the status of a Cadet, carried that status with him on transfer here; but the answer is I think that only Cadet Officers and not officers having the status of a Cadet, are interchangeable: if it were otherwise, we, having no officers with the status of Cadet who are not Cadets, would have no one to send to the Federated Malay States and should therefore be the losers. Further it is to be borne in mind that the interchangeability of Cadet Officers was first promulgated in 1896, a date posterior to the date when Mr. Irving joined the Service of the State of Perak as a Junior Officer in 1891.
:
Coming new to the 4th. paragraph
of Mr. Irving's letter on the point of promotion, He seems to base his eligibility for promotion on a telegram from
the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.